Versión en Español


Alleged Discrepancies

Article Reprints

Audio Resources

Bible Bullets

Darwin Day Debate

Decisive Designs


“In the News”

Reason & Revelation

Research Articles

Scripturally Speaking

Sensible Science


Discovery for Kids

Examine the Evidence

Home Study Courses



A.P. Information

About AP

Contact AP

Copyright Statement

Help AP

Privacy Statement

Speaking Schedules

A.P. Scientists and
Auxiliary Writers

Usage Guidelines

Apologetics Press :: Sensible Science

15 Answers to John Rennie and Scientific American’s Nonsense - Conclusion & References
by Bert Thompson, Ph.D. and Brad Harrub, Ph.D.

Printer version | Email this article

Jump to:
Full HTML version

Argument #1
Argument #2
Argument #3
Argument #4
Argument #5
Argument #6
Argument #7
Argument #8
Full PDF version

Argument #9
Argument #10
Argument #11
Argument #12
Argument #13
Argument #14
Argument #15
Conclusion & References


In his book, Nemesis: The Death-Star and Other Theories of Mass Extinction, Donald Goldsmith made the following comments:

People who simply demand results may not consider the important distinction between scientists’ perceptions and pseudoscientists’ procedures, but scientists do. By constructing an environment—the world of science—in which theories survive not because they are emotionally satisfying but because they fit into the existing framework more successfully than competing theories, scientists have created the potential for anyone within their purview to make important advances in our collective knowledge. Individuals make the theories; the social structure of science does the testing. If you don’t accept this principle, you don’t belong to the scientific community. This does not mean that your ideas must be wrong, only that you (and they) won’t be taken seriously. No one guarantees that your ideas will always receive serious consideration in any case, but there is no hope if you don’t “think like a scientist”—accept the proposition that your ideas may or may not be right, and look for ways to prove the former and reject the latter (1985, p. 157, emp. added, parenthetical item in orig.).

Notice the phrases that “the social structure of science does the testing” and that “no one guarantees that your ideas will always receive serious consideration” if you don’t “think like a scientist.”

In today’s climate, the “social structure of science” is based in its entirety on the concept of evolution. Read that last phrase, therefore, as—“if you don’t think like an evolutionist!” Doubt that? Listen to Niles Eldredge in his book, The Triumph of Evolution and the Failure of Creationism.

This basic notion of evolution is thoroughly scientific in the strictest sense of the word, and as such is as highly corroborated and at least as powerful as the notion or gravity or the idea that the Earth is round, spins on its axis, and revolves around the sun. In the realm of science—and indeed in grander arenas of human knowledge and wisdom—evolution truly is triumphant (2000, p. 31, emp. added).

And so, if you don’t accept the reality of the triumphant nature of evolution, “you don’t belong to the scientific community.” With those thoughts in mind, consider the following.

In their opening “letter from the editors” (“Bad Science and False Facts”), the editors of Scientific American made the following statement: “Ideas deserve a fair hearing, but fairness shouldn’t be an excuse for letting rejected, inadequate ideas persist. Intelligent design and other variants of creationism lack credible support and don’t mesh with the naturalistic fabric of all other science. They don’t deserve to be taught as legitimate scientific alternatives to evolution any more than flat-earth cosmology does” (2002, 287[1]:10). Mr. Rennie then concluded his article by stating that “creationism, by any name, adds nothing of intellectual value to the effort” (p. 85).

Apparently it is acceptable for evolutionists to spout “rejected, inadequate ideas”—like Archaeopteryx still being considered as a “missing link” between reptiles and birds, Eohippus having given rise to Equus, the “fact” that genetic mutations actually possess the power to pass on completely new information and cause evolution at the level of the genus, family, class, order, or phylum, etc. But it is not acceptable for creationists to point out that exactly the opposite is known to be true scientifically. Nor is it acceptable for creationists to employ what the “man on the street” recognizes as everyday common sense—that from the microcosm to the macrocosm, the world around us is filled with evidence of design, which can only mean that there had to have been a Designer.

Mr. Rennie and his colleagues would do well to examine more closely the rejected inadequacies of evolutionary theory before spouting their venom against those of us who already have carried out such an investigation. They can attempt to belittle creationism by aligning it with “flat-earth” cosmology, and they can claim with all their professional might that creationism holds “nothing of intellectual value,” but that will not change the evidence—and it will not make us go away. Make no mistake about it: we will continue to stand in defense of that evidence! In fact, seeing the paltriness of evolution only causes us to be more determined to see the ultimate collapse of evolutionary theory. And, if we may kindly say so, if the type of arguments that Mr. Rennie employed in his Scientific American article are the best the scientific community has to offer, that collapse surely cannot be too far in the distant future.

Evolutionists need to know: we will not go quietly into the night. And when the dust settles, it will not be evolution that is “triumphant,” but truth—the truth of creationism.


Abelson, Phillip (1964), “Bigotry in Science,” Science, 144:373, April 24.

Ackerknect, E.H. (1973), “Rudolph Virchow,” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 23:35.

Adler, Irving (1963), Probability and Statistics for Everyman (New York: John Day).

Adler, Jerry (1980), “Is Man a Subtle Accident?,” Newsweek, 96[18]:95, November 3.

Anderson, Alan (1991), “Early Bird Threatens Archaeopteryx’s Perch,” Science, 253:35, July 5.

Andrews, E.H. (1978), From Nothing to Nature (Welwyn, Hertfordshire, England: Evangelical Press).

Asimov, Isaac (1962), Life and Energy (New York: Doubleday).

Asimov, Isaac (1970), “In the Game of Energy and Thermodynamics You Can’t Even Break Even,” Smithsonian Institute Journal, pp. 4-10, June.

Asimov, Isaac (1973), “Can Decreasing Entropy Exist in the Universe?,” Science Digest, 73:76-77, May.

“Bad Science and False Facts,” Scientific American, 287[1]:10, July.

Baldi, Pierre (2001), The Shattered Self (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Barnes, F.A. (1971), “Mine Operation Uncovers Puzzling Remains of Ancient Man,” Moab [Utah] Times-Independent, June 3.

Barnes, F.A. (1975), “The Case of the Bones in Stone,” Desert, pp. 38-39, February.

Barrow, John D. and Frank Tipler (1986), The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford, England: Oxford University Press).

Beardsley, Tim (1986), “Fossil Bird Shakes Evolutionary Hypothesis,” Nature, 322:677, August 21.

Becker, Brent (1988), Creation/Evolution Newsletter (Athens, WV: National Center for Science Education), 8[1]:19-20.

Begley, Sharon, (1992), “Is Science Censored,” Newsweek, p. 63, September 14.

Benen, Steve (2002) “The Discovery Institute: Genesis of Intelligent Design,” [On-line], URL:

Bethell, Tom (1976), “Darwin’ Mistake,” Harper’s Magazine, 252:70-75, February.

Bethell, Tom (1985), “Agnostic Evolutionists: The Taxonomic Case Against Darwin,” Harper’s, 270[1617]:49-52,56-58,60-61, February.

Block, Irvin (1980), “The Worlds Within You,” Science Digest special edition, pp. 49-53,118, September/October.

Blum, Harold (1968), Time’s Arrow and Evolution (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

Borek, Ernest (1973), The Sculpture of Life (New York: Columbia University Press).

Borel, Emile (1962), Probabilities and Life (New York: Dover).

Borel, Emile (1965), Elements of the Theory of Probability (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

Bower, Bruce (1989), “A Walk Back Through Evolution,” Science News, 135[16]:251, April 22.

Brunet M., Guy F., Pilbeam D., Mackay H.T., Likius A., Djimboumalbaye A. et al. (2002), “ A New Hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa,” Nature, 418:145-151, July 11.

Buckna, David (2002), “Do Creationists Publish in Notable Refereed Journals?,” [On-line], URL:

Cavalli-Sforza Luigi L. (2000), Genes, Peoples, and Languages (New York: North Point Press).

Chatterjee, Sankar (1991), “Cranial Anatomy and Relationships of a New Triassic Bird from Texas,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (biology), 332:277-346.

Clark, W. LeGros (1955), Discover, January.

Coppedge, James E. (1973), Evolution: Probable or Improbable? (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan).

“Council for Media Integrity,” (no date), [On-line], URL:

Crawford, F.H. (1963), Heat, Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World).

Crick, Francis (1981), Life Itself: Its Origin and Nature (New York: Simon and Schuster).

Darwin, Charles (1859), The Origin of Species (New York: Avenel Books, reprint of first edition).

Darwin, Francis, ed. (1888), The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin (London: D. Appleton).

Davies, Paul (1984), Superforce: The Search for a Grand Unified Theory of Nature (New York: Simon & Schuster).

Davies, Paul (1988), The Cosmic Blueprint: New Discoveries in Nature’s Creative Ability to Order the Universe (New York: Simon & Schuster).

Davies, Paul (1992a), The Mind of God (New York: Simon & Schuster).

Davies, Paul (1992b), “The Mind of God,” Omni, 14[5]:4, February.

Dawkins, Richard (1982), “The Necessity of Darwinism,” New Scientist, 94:130-132, April 15.

Denton, Michael (1985), Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (London: Burnett Books).

Denton, Michael (1998), Nature’s Destiny: How the Laws of Biology Reveal Purpose in the Universe (New York: Simon & Schuster).

de Vries, Hugo (1905), Species and Varieties: Their Origin by Mutation, ed. Daniel Trembly MacDougal (Chicago, IL: Open Court).

Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1956), The Biological Basis of Human Freedom (New York: Columbia University Press).

Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1967), “Changing Man,” Science, 155:409, January 27.

Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1975), “Darwin or ‘Oriented’ Evolution?,” Evolution, 29:376.

Eddington, Arthur (1930), The Nature of the Physical World (New York: Macmillan).

Eden, Murray (1967), “Inadequacies of Neo-Darwinian Evolution as a Scientific Theory,” Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution, ed. Paul S. Moorhead and Martin M. Kaplan, Wistar Symposium No. 5 (Philadelphia, PA: Wistar Institute).

Eiseley, Loren (1979), “Charles Darwin, Edward Blyth, and the Theory of Natural Selection,” Philosophical Society, 103:94.

Ehrlich, Paul and L.C. Birch (1967), “Evolutionary History and Population Biology,” Nature, 214:349-352, April 22.

Eldredge, Niles (1982), The Monkey Business (New York: Pocket Books).

Eldredge, Niles (2000), The Triumph of Evolution and the Failure of Creationism (New York: W.H. Freeman).

Ellis, Richard (2001), Aquagenesis (New York: Viking).

Feduccia, Allan (1993), “Evidence from Claw Geometry Indicating Arboreal Habits of Archaeopteryx,” Science, 259:790-793, February 5.

Ferrigno, Paul Ko (2000), “The Nano-Scale Architecture of the Nucleus,” Trends in Cell Biology, 10:366.

Fox, Sidney W. (1971), “Chemical Origins of Cells [Part II]” Chemical and Engineering News, 49[50]:46, December 6.

Fox, Sidney and Klaus Dose (1977), Molecular Evolution and the Origin of Life (New York: Marcel Dekker).

Fukuyama, Francis (2002), Our Posthuman Future (New York: Ferrar, Straus, and Giroux).

Gamow, George (1961), One, Two, Three—Infinity (New York: Viking).

Gee, Henry (1999), In Search of Deep Time (New York: Free Press).

Gentry, Robert V. (1988), Creation’s Tiny Mystery (Knoxville, TN: Earth Science Associates), second edition.

Gish, Duane T. (1976), “The Origin of Life: Theories on the Origin of Biological Order,” Impact #37 (El Cajon, CA: Institute for Creation Research), July.

Gish, Duane T. (1981), “The Origin of Biological Order and the Second Law,” Thermodynamics and the Development of Order, ed. Emmett Williams (Ann Arbor, MI: Creation Research Society).

Glasstone, S. (1946), Textbook of Physical Chemistry (New York: D. Van Nostrand).

Golay, Marcel J.E. (1961), “Reflections of a Communications Engineer,” Analytical Chemistry, June.

Goldsmith, Donald (1985), Nemesis: The Death-Star and Other Theories of Mass Extinction (New York: Berkley Books).

Gorman, Jessica (2001), “Cosmic Chemistry Gets Creative,” Science News, 159:317-319, May 19.

Gould, Stephen Jay (1977a), “Evolution’s Erratic Pace,” Natural History, 86[5]:12-16, May.

Gould, Stephen Jay (1977b), “The Return of Hopeful Monsters,” Natural History, 86[6]:22-30, June/July.

Gould, Stephen Jay (1980), The Panda’s Thumb (New York: W.W. Norton).

Gould, Stephen Jay (1987a), “Darwinism Defined: The Difference Between Fact and Theory,” Discover, 8[1]:64-65,68-70, January.

Gould, Stephen Jay (1987b), “Justice Scalia’s Misunderstanding,” Natural History, 96[10]:14,16,18,20-21, October.

Gould, Stephen Jay (1999), “Dorothy, It’s Really Oz,” Time, 154[8]:59, August 23.

Grassé, Pierre-Paul (1977), The Evolution of Living Organisms (New York: Academic Press).

Greenstein, George (1988), The Symbiotic Universe (New York: William Morrow).

Gregory R.L. (1972), Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson), second edition.

Gribbin, John (1981), “Of a Comet Born,” Science Digest, 89[3]:14, April.

Grigg, Russell (2000), “Did Life Come from Outer Space?,” Creation, 22[4]:40-43, September-November.

Guinness, Alma E., ed. (1987), ABC’s of the Human Body (Pleasantville, NY: Reader’s Digest Association).

Harrub, Brad and Bert Thompson (2001), “Archaeopteryx, Archaeoraptor, and the ‘Dinosaurs-to-Birds’ Theory” [Parts I&II], Reason & Revelation, 21:25-31,33-39, April and May.

Harrub, Brad and Bert Thompson (2002), “Creationists Fight Back: A Review of U.S. News & World Report’s Cover Story on Evolution,” Reason & Revelation, 22:65-70, September.

Harrub, Brad, Bert Thompson, and Eric Lyons (2002), “Human Evolution and the ‘Record of the Rocks,’; ” Reason & Revelation, 22:33-39, May.

Hayward, Alan (1985), Creation or Evolution: The Facts and the Fallacies (London: Triangle Books).

Heeren, Fred (1995), Show Me God (Wheeling, IL: Searchlight Publications).

Heinze, Thomas (2002), How Life Began (Ontario, CA: Chick Publications).

Hitching, Francis (1982), The Neck of the Giraffe (New York: New American Library).

Hoesch, Bill (2002), “A Reply to Rennie,” Institute for Creation Research, [On-line], URL:

Hoyle, Fred (1959), Religion and the Scientists, as quoted in Barrow, John and Frank Tipler, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford, England: Oxford University Press).

Hoyle, Fred (1981a), “The Big Bang in Astronomy,” New Scientist, 92:521-527, November 19.

Hoyle, Fred (1981b), “Hoyle on Evolution,” Nature, 294:105,148, November 12.

Hoyle, Fred (1982), “The Universe: Past and Present Reflections,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20:16.

Hoyle, Fred and Chandra Wickramasinghe (1981), Evolution from Space (London: J.M. Dent & Sons).

Hoyle, Fred and Chandra Wickramasinghe (1991), “Where Microbes Boldly Went,” New Scientist, 91:415, August.

Huxley, Julian (1955), “Evolution and Genetics,” What Is Science?, ed. J.R. Newman (New York: Simon and Schuster).

Jackson, Wayne (1993), The Human Body: Accident or Design? (Stockton, CA: Courier Publications).

Jastrow, Robert (1977), Until the Sun Dies (New York: Warner Books).

Kaiser, Walter C. (1980), “Kind,” Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, ed. R.L. Harris, G.L. Archer, B.K. Waltke (Chicago, IL: Moody), 1:503-504.

Kaplan, R.W. (1971), “The Problem of Chance Information of Protobionts by Random Aggregation of Macromolecules,” Chemical Evolution and the Origin of Life, ed. R. Buver and C. Ponnamperuma (New York: American Elsevier).

Kautz, Darrel (1988), The Origin of Living Things (Milwaukee, WI: Privately published by the author).

Keith Arthur (1949), Evolution and Ethics (New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons)

Kerkut, G.A. (1960), The Implications of Evolution (London: Pergamon).

King, A.C. and C.B. Read (1963), Pathways to Probability (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston).

King, A.L. (1962) Thermophysics (San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman).

Kirk, David (1975), Biology Today (New York: Random House).

Kitts, David G. (1974), “Paleontology and Evolutionary Theory,” Evolution, 28:458-472, September.

Koestler, Arthur (1978), Janus: A Summing Up (New York: Vintage Books).

Layzer, David (1975), “The Arrow of Time,” Scientific American, 223:56, December.

Leakey, Mary (1979), “Footprints in the Ashes of Time,” National Geographic, 155:446-457, April.

Leakey, Mary (1984), Disclosing the Past (New York: Doubleday).

Lenihan, John (1974), Human Engineering (New York: John Braziller).

Levi-Setti Riccardo (1993), Trilobites (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

Lewin, Roger (1980), “Evolution Theory Under Fire,” Science, 210:884, November 21.

Lewontin, Richard C. (1995), Human Diversity (New York: Scientific American Library).

Lipson, H.S. (1980), “A Physicist Looks at Evolution,” Physics Bulletin, 31:138, May.

Lloyd, James E. (1982), Florida Entomologist, 65:1.

Løvtrup, Søren (1987), Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth (London: Croom Helm).

Lubenow, Marvin L. (1992), Bones of Contention: A Creationist Assessment of Human Fossils (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).

MacBeth, Norman (1982), “Darwinism: A Time for Funerals,” Towards, Spring.

Maddox, John (1994), “The Genesis Code by Numbers,” Nature, 367:111, January 13.

Mayr, Ernst (2001), What Evolution Is (New York: Basic Books).

McDonough, James T. Jr., ed. (1994), Stedman’s Concise Medical Dictionary (Philadelphia, PA: Williams & Wilkins), second edition.

Miller, Benjamin and Goode, Ruth (1960), Man and His Body (New York: Simon and Schuster).

Miller, Stanley (1996), From Primordial Soup to the Prebiotic Beach, [On-line], URL:

Moe, Martin A. (1981), “Genes on Ice,” Science Digest, 89[11]:36,95, December.

Moore, John A. (2002), From Genesis to Genetics (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

Moore, John N. and H.S. Slusher (1974), Biology: A Search for Order in Complexity (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan).

Moorhead P.S. and M.M. Kaplan, eds. (1967), Mathematical Challenges to the neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution, Monograph #5, (Philadelphia, PA: Wistar University Press).

Morowitz, Harold J. (1968), Energy Flow in Biology (New York: Academic Press).

Morris, Henry M. (1974), Scientific Creationism (San Diego, CA: Creation-Life Publishers).

Morris, Henry M. and Gary E. Parker (1987), What Is Creation Science? (El Cajon, CA: Master Books).

Morris, John D. (2002), “There They Go Again!,” Acts and Facts, 31[9]:1-2, September.

Morris, Richard (1985), Time’s Arrows: Scientific Attitudes Toward Time (New York: Simon & Schuster).

Morris, Richard (2001), The Evolutionists: The Struggle for Darwin’s Soul (New York: W.H. Freeman).

Muller, H.J. (1957), “Man’s Place in Living Nature,” Scientific Monthly, 84[5]:245-250, May.

Murphy, Nancey and George F.R. Ellis (1996), On the Moral Nature of the Universe (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress).

Murray, Michael J. (1999), Reason for the Hope Within (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).

Nilsson, Heribert (1954), Synthetische Artbildung (Lund, Sweden: Vertag CWE Gleenrup).

Oktar, Adnan (2002), “Scientific American’s 15 Errors,” [On-line], URL:

Orgel, Leslie E. (1994), “The Origin of Life on the Earth,” Scientific American, 271:77-83, October.

Patterson, Colin (1981), Speech given in November at American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Quotations are from audio tape transcript. See Bethell (1985) for a report on Dr. Patterson’s speech.

Patterson, Colin (1982), “Cladistics” [Interview on British Broadcasting Corporation, March 4; interviewer, Peter Franz, producer, Brian Lak].

Pennock, Robert T. (1999), Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Penzias Arno, (1992), as quoted in Cosmos, Bios, and Theos, ed. Henry Margenau and Abraham Varghese (La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishers).

Peseley, G.A. (1982), “The Epistemological Status of Natural Selection,” Laval Theologique et Philosophique, February.

Pfeiffer, John (1964), The Cell (New York: Time, Inc.).

Ratzsch, Del (2000), Science and Its Limits: The Natural Sciences in Christian Perspective (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press).

Raup, D. (1979), “Conflicts Between Darwin and Paleontology,” Field Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 50[1]:24-25.

Rennie, John (2002), “15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense,” Scientific American, 287[1]:78-85, July.

Rensberger, Boyce (1981), “Tinkering with Life,” Science, 2[9]:44-49, November.

Rensberger, Boyce (1997), “How Science Responds When Creationists Criticize Evolution,” Washington Post, January 8.

Ricci, Paul (1986), Fundamentals of Critical Thinking (Lexington, MA: Ginn Press).

Rifkin, Jeremy (1980), Entropy: A New World View (New York: Viking).

Rifkin, Jeremy (1983), Algeny (New York: Viking).

Ross, John (1980), “Letter to the Editor,” Chemical and Engineering News, p. 40, July 7.

Rudin, Norah (1997), Dictionary of Modern Biology (Hauppauge, NY: Barrons).

Sagan, Carl, ed. (1973), Communications with Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (Boston, MA: MIT Press).

Sagan, Carl (1974), “Life on Earth,” Encyclopaedia Britannica (New York: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.), 10:894ff.

Sagan, Carl (1997), “Life,” Encyclopaedia Britannica (New York: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.), 22:964-981.

Salisbury, Frank (1969), “Natural Selection and the Complexity of the Gene,” Nature, October 25.

Salisbury, Frank (1971), “Doubts About the Modern Synthetic Theory of Evolution,” American Biology Teacher, September.

Sarfati, Jonathan (2002a), “15 Ways to Refute Materialistic Bigotry,” [On-line], URL:

Sarfati, Jonathan (2002b), “The Second Law of Thermodynamics: Answers to Critics,” [On-line], URL:

Schwartz Jeffrey H. (1999), Sudden Origins (New York: John Wiley & Sons).

Scientific American: The Legacy Continues for 150 Years,” (2002), [On-line], URL:

Shawver, Lisa J. (1974), “Trilobite Eyes: An Impressive Feat of Early Evolution,” Science News, 105:72, February 2.

Simpson, George Gaylord (1944) Tempo and Mode in Evolution (New York: Columbia University Press).

Simpson, George Gaylord (1953), Life of the Past (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

Simpson, George Gaylord (1964), This View of Life (New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World),

Simpson, George Gaylord and W.S. Beck (1965), Life: An Introduction to Biology (New York: Harcourt-Brace).

Smith, Charles J. (1975), “Problems with Entropy in Biology,” Biosystems, 1:259.

Sullivan, J.W.N. (1933), The Limitations of Science (New York: Viking).

Sunderland, Luther (1984), Darwin’s Enigma (El Cajon, CA: Master Books).

Takahata, N. (1995), “A Genetic Perspective on the Origin and History of Humans,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26:343-372.

Taylor, Gordon Rattray (1983), The Great Evolution Mystery (New York: Harper and Row).

Taylor, Ian (1984), In the Minds of Men: Darwin and the New World Order (Toronto: TFE Publishing).

Thaxton, Charles B., Walter L. Bradley, and Roger L. Olsen (1984), The Mystery of Life’s Origin (New York: Philosophical Library).

Thompson, Bert and Trevor J. Major (1988), “Evolution and the Laws of Thermodynamics [Parts I-IV],” Reason & Revelation, 8:5-22, February, March, April, and May.

Thompson, Silvanus P. (1910), Life of Lord Kelvin (London: Macmillan).

Thompson, W.R. (1956), “Introduction,” The Origin of Species (New York: E.P. Dutton & Sons), pp. vii-xxv.

Tipler, Frank (1994), The Physics of Immortality (New York: Doubleday).

Tuttle, Russell (1990), “The Pitted Pattern of Laetoli Feet,” Natural History, pp. 60-65, March.

Twain, Mark (1883), Life on the Mississippi (Boston, MA: Gambit).

Van Wylen, Gordon J. and Richard Sonntag (1985), Fundamentals of Classical Thermodynamics (New York: John Wiley & Sons).

Walters, Tracy (1986), “A Reply to John Patterson’s Arguments,” Origins Research, 9[2]:8-9, fall/winter. [Mr. Walters’ article was written as a response to “Does Thermodynamics Demand Supernatural Origins?” by evolutionist John Patterson, published in the same issue of Origins Research as a part of a two-way dialog on thermodynamics in the creation/evolution controversy.]

Watson, James D. (1968), The Double Helix (New York: Atheneum).

“Whose Ape Is It, Anyway?” (1984), Science News, 125[23]:361, June 9.

Wieland, Carl (2002), “Some Thermodynamics Criticisms—and Answers,” [On-line], URL: negative_22april2002.asp.

Wilford, John N. (2002), “Skulls Found in Africa and Europe Challenge Theories of Human Origins,” [On-line], URL: 06SKUL.html?tntemail1.

Williams, Emmett L. ed (1981), Thermodynamics and the Development of Order (Ann Arbor, MI: Creation Research Society).

Wysong, R.L. (1976), The Creation-Evolution Controversy (East Lansing, MI: Inquiry Press).

Youmans, W.B. (1979), in World Book Encyclopedia (Chicago, IL: World Book/Childcraft International).

Young Willard (1985), Fallacies of Creationism (Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Detselig Enterprises Ltd.).

Copyright © 2002 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

We are happy to grant permission for items in the "Sensible Science" section to be reproduced in their entirety, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) the author’s name must remain attached to the materials; (4) any references, footnotes, or endnotes that accompany the article must be included with any written reproduction of the article; (5) alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, quotations, etc. must be reproduced exactly as they appear in the original); (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, in whole or in part, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken.

For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:

Apologetics Press
230 Landmark Drive
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
Phone (334) 272-8558

Web site engine code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.150 Seconds