Versión en Español


Alleged Discrepancies

Article Reprints

Audio Resources

Bible Bullets

Darwin Day Debate

Decisive Designs


“In the News”

Reason & Revelation

Research Articles

Scripturally Speaking

Sensible Science


Discovery for Kids

Examine the Evidence

Home Study Courses



A.P. Information

About AP

Contact AP

Copyright Statement

Help AP

Privacy Statement

Speaking Schedules

A.P. Scientists and
Auxiliary Writers

Usage Guidelines

Apologetics Press :: Alleged Discrepancies

Did God Tempt Abraham?
by A.P. Staff

Printer version | Email this article

We serve an upright and just God “…who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation make also the way of escape, that ye may be able to endure it” (1 Corinthians 10:13). Also, “[l]et no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God; for God cannot be tempted with evil, and he himself tempteth no man…” (James 1:13, emp. added). But how, some skeptics may ask, can James be correct if Genesis 22:1 says that God “ tempted” Abraham into sacrificing Isaac? The passage reads:

And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham, and said unto him, “Abraham”: and he said, “Behold, here I am” (KJV, emp. added).

And it came to pass after these things, that God did prove Abraham, and said unto him, “Abraham.” And he said, “Here am I” (ASV, emp. added).

After these things God tested Abraham, and said to him, “Abraham!” And he said, “Here am I” (RSV, emp. added).

Now it came to pass after these things that God tested Abraham, and said to him, “ Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am” (NKJV, emp. added).

Now it came about after these things, that God tested Abraham, and said to him, “ Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am” (NASB, emp. added).

Some time later God tested Abraham. He said to him, “Abraham!” “Here I am,” he replied ( NIV, emp. added).

Out of the six common translations listed, only the King James Version says that God tempted Abraham. The Hebrew word nissâ, which the King James renders as “tempt,” is defined as “test” in both the Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament (Botterweck, 1998, 9:443-455) and the Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (Jenni, 1997, 2:741-742). The American Standard Version, which many consider the most accurate translation of the Bible currently in print, and the New King James Version do not render nissâ as “tempt.” In fact, four out of the five other translations given use “test” for nissâ, which fits with both the context of the verse and the Hebrew word used. As Wayne Jackson stated:

[O]ne meaning of tempt is “a solicitation to sin, an enticement to evil.” It is an action designed to entrap a victim, hence, to bring about his fall. A holy God (cf. Isaiah 6:3 and Revelation 7:14) never could be guilty of such a base activity, and this is the thrust of James’ description of this matter in the passage cited above (1987, p. 14, parenthetical items in orig.).

The case of God tempting Abraham is no more than a mistranslation by the seventeenth-century authors of the King James Version.

So why did God command Abraham to sacrifice Isaac? The simple reason is given in the verse itself: God was testing Abraham’s obedience. Isaac was the only son of Abraham and Sarah, and the heir to God’s promise of a great nation (Genesis 12:1-3), so how else would God test Abraham’s loyalty to Him than by asking Abraham to give up what was perhaps his greatest possession (cf. Hebrews 11:17-19). God, by keeping Abraham from completing the sacrifice, seemingly never intended for Isaac to be killed, but merely wished to see if Abraham would obey.


Botterweck, G. Johannes, Helmer Ringgren, and Heinz-Josef Fabry (1998), Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans), 9:443-455

Jackson, Wayne (1987), “Questions and Answers,” Reason & Revelation, 13:14, April.

Jenni, Ernst and Claus Westerman (1997), Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson), 2:741-742.

Copyright © 2004 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

We are happy to grant permission for items in the "Alleged Discrepancies" section to be reproduced in their entirety, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) the author’s name must remain attached to the materials; (4) any references, footnotes, or endnotes that accompany the article must be included with any written reproduction of the article; (5) alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, quotations, etc. must be reproduced exactly as they appear in the original); (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, in whole or in part, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken.

For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:

Apologetics Press
230 Landmark Drive
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
Phone (334) 272-8558

Web site engine code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.097 Seconds