After Moses broke the first tablets of stone that the Lord gave him on Mount Sinai, God
commanded him to cut out two tablets of stone (like the first ones) and present himself to Him at
the top of Mount Sinaiagain (Exodus 34:1-2). Skeptics claim the Bible teaches in Exodus 34
that Moses wrote on this second pair of tablets, whereas in Deuteronomy 10 it says that God is the
One Who wrote on these tablets. Based upon this difference, they allege that a blatant
contradiction exists. A closer examination of these passages, however, reveals that they are not
contradictory, but rather complimentary and consistent with each other.
We readily admit that Deuteronomy 10 teaches that God was the One Who wrote on the second pair
of tablets. Verses 1-4 of that chapter say:
At that time the Lord said to me (Moses), Hew for yourself two tablets of
stone like the first, and come up to Me on the mountain and make yourself an ark of wood. And I
[God] will write on the tablets the words that were on the first tablets, which you
broke; and you shall put them in the ark. So I [Moses] made an ark of acacia wood, hewed two
tablets of stone like the first, and went up the mountain, having the two tablets in my hand. And
He (God) wrote on the tablets according to the first writing, the Ten Commandments,
which the Lord had spoken to you in the mountain from the midst of the fire in the day of the
assembly; and the Lord gave them to me (Deuteronomy 10:1-4, emp. and parenthetical items added).
This passage teaches that Moses hewed the tablets out of rock, but that God was the One Who
wrote on them. Skeptics agree.
The controversial passage found in Exodus 34 states: Then the Lord said to Moses,
Write these words, for according to the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with you and
with Israel. So he was there with the Lord forty days and forty nights; he neither ate bread
nor drank water. And He wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments
(34:27-28). Based upon this passage, critics of the Bibles inerrancy suggest that Moses, not
God, wrote on the second pair of tablets. Thus they conclude that Exodus 34 and Deuteronomy 10
contradict one another.
Admittedly, at first glance it seems these verses teach: (1) that Moses was commanded to write
the words on the second pair of tablets; and (2) the recorded fact that after he was commanded to
do so, he (Moses) actually wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant. But what
may seem to be the correct interpretation of a passage is sometimes not the case, especially when
the context of the passage is ignored. The words that God instructed Moses to write were
these words, which He spoke in the preceding verses (i.e., 34:10-26the ceremonial and
judicial injunctions, not the ten words of Exodus 20:2-17). The rewriting of the Ten
Commandments on the newly prepared slabs was done by Gods own hand. God specifically stated
in the first verse of Exodus 34 that He (not Moses) would write the same words that had been
written on the first tablets of stone that Moses broke. In verse 28 of that chapter, we have it on
record that God did what He said He would do in verse one (cf. Deuteronomy 10:2-4). The only thing
verse 27 teaches is that Moses wrote the list of regulations given in verses 10-26. That these
regulations were not the Ten Commandments is obvious in that there are not even ten of them listed
(Coffman, 1985, p. 474).
Contrary to what skeptics allege, Exodus 34 and Deuteronomy 10 are not contradictory. Moses
was not acting under divine direction to physically write the Decalogue on the second pair of
tablets. Rather, as Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown recognized in their commentary on Deuteronomy,
God Himself...made the inscription a second time with His own hand, to testify the
importance He attached to the Ten Commandments (1997).
Coffman, James Burton (1985), Commentary on Exodus (Abilene, TX: ACU Press).
Jamieson, Robert, et al. (1997), Jamieson, Faussett, Brown Bible Commentary (Electronic
Copyright © 2004 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
We are happy to grant permission for items in the "Alleged Discrepancies" section to be reproduced in their entirety, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) the authors name must remain attached to the materials; (4) any references, footnotes, or endnotes that accompany the article must be included with any written reproduction of the article; (5) alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, quotations, etc. must be reproduced exactly as they appear in the original); (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, in whole or in part, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken.
For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:
230 Landmark Drive
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
Phone (334) 272-8558